I'm a voracious reader. One who will, most of the time, enjoy reading a wide variety of books from an equally eclectic mix of genres.
Well, except for horror.
Horror, frankly, scares me. While I appreciate that the aim of horror is in fact to frighten people, I've learned that I don't much care for intentional terror. It's true that some who know me well will express some surprise at that statement and suggest that since they know I'm a total sucker for vampires, particularly ones that look like
this, it's a bit disingenuous to say that I don't like horror.
I must scoff at this view because, come on, even if you're not into Billy Idol lookalikes, does this look like something you'd run away from? Totally doesn't count.
Nor do most books that deal with zombies. Again, it's true that some will assert that zombies are pretty scary things. I would have agreed with this view 10 years ago, but being forever attached to
Rebecca means that I learned long ago to squelch any creeping feelings of dread, terror and general ickiness when faced with any number of films, graphic novels or books dealing with the walking dead.
So they don't count either.
Anything else in the horror grab bag of tricks? Absolutely out of my comfort zone.
Lately however, I've revisited my self imposed ban on horror novels because of Stephen King. Quite some time ago
Mental Multivitamin mentioned Stephen King's
On Writing: A Memoir of the Craft and I thought I'd take a look at it. Having read
Dance Macabre years ago, I was fairly comfortable reading King's nonfiction and not too worried about any emotional repercussions from reading more. Besides I had been reading and enjoying him as the best part of
Entertainment Weekly for a while, so what was there to be afraid of?
The book was, as are most of the books recommended by Mental Multivitamin, well worth reading. Having grown up near the area that Mr. King spent a portion of his childhood simply added to the appeal of this book for me. After finishing it, I decided to give his fiction another try. I say "another try", because the first time I read a Stephen King novel was
Salem's Lot at age 14.
Let's just say that I struggled a bit with it.
As in I slept with a cross on my windowsill and begged anyone I thought might be Catholic for holy water for over a year. What can I say? This happened way before Spike made his prime time appearance and vampires still scared me.
Why potentially subject myself to this again, even so many years later? It's a good question. Honestly, after reading
On Writing, I was really curious to take a look at his novels. So recently I read
Christine. I'm still not entirely sure how I feel about this book. On the one hand, it
was difficult to put down. It also caused some uneasiness, actually to the point where I didn't want to read it while in bed. I truly thought I was beyond being scared by a novel, but apparently I can still be unsettled by the written word. It was interesting to see themes in Christine that were discussed in
On Writing, particularly those dealing with teen alienation and cliques. On the other hand though, the ending was deeply dissatisfying to me, although I'm not sure it should be. While we all want characters in a book to act in a superhuman way, with clear insight into how to solve a problem, real life simply isn't that way. So maybe the ending makes sense given the characters involved. Ultimately it was definitely worth a read.
Will I try another King novel? I'm not sure. I'm truly surprised at the reluctance I feel when thinking of attempting another. It's certainly not because I feel
Christine was poorly written or plotted, it really is just that I'm uneasy at the thought of being frightened.
Guess that 14 yr. old is still there.